<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Two Goats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twogoats.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twogoats.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Ideas, tips, and news for international development project managers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:55:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Compassion takes a blogging risk by Lynnita</title>
		<link>http://twogoats.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/compassion-takes-a-blogging-risk/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynnita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twogoats.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Good luck in pulling together your next trip -- I look forward to watching that come together.  I&#039;m subscribed to just about every Compassion feed available now ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck in pulling together your next trip &#8212; I look forward to watching that come together.  I&#8217;m subscribed to just about every Compassion feed available now &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compassion takes a blogging risk by shaungroves</title>
		<link>http://twogoats.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/compassion-takes-a-blogging-risk/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>shaungroves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twogoats.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Lynnita, thanks for the link to our blogging trip.  Much appreciated.

I&#039;m the guy charged with putting together the next trip (details coming) for Compassion - a recruiter I suppose - and getting the word out about Compassion on blogs of all shapes and sizes.  I just started.  We just launched &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.compassionbloggers.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.CompassionBloggers.com&lt;/a&gt; as a first step.  All that to say, I&#039;d love to hear any advise you and your readers have to offer me/us.  All this is new and we&#039;re learning. Send any thoughts my way at contact@compassionbloggers.com

Thanks again for the public encouragement.

-Shaun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynnita, thanks for the link to our blogging trip.  Much appreciated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the guy charged with putting together the next trip (details coming) for Compassion &#8211; a recruiter I suppose &#8211; and getting the word out about Compassion on blogs of all shapes and sizes.  I just started.  We just launched <a href="http://www.compassionbloggers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.CompassionBloggers.com</a> as a first step.  All that to say, I&#8217;d love to hear any advise you and your readers have to offer me/us.  All this is new and we&#8217;re learning. Send any thoughts my way at <a href="mailto:contact@compassionbloggers.com">contact@compassionbloggers.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks again for the public encouragement.</p>
<p>-Shaun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compassion takes a blogging risk by Lynnita</title>
		<link>http://twogoats.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/compassion-takes-a-blogging-risk/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynnita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twogoats.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chris, for responding to these ideas - and so quickly!  

Your point about the debate between full text feeds vs. partial text feeds is fair -- it does seem to be pretty evenly divided between the two camps.  I happen to have fallen in the camp that likes full posts.  I&#039;ll look forward to seeing the modified posts in my reader, though.

And the truth is, I love the ground rules for commenting that you&#039;ve laid out, especially in their new revised form.  They&#039;re easy to read and make a lot of sense.

Really looking forward to tracking with you on your blogging journey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chris, for responding to these ideas &#8211; and so quickly!  </p>
<p>Your point about the debate between full text feeds vs. partial text feeds is fair &#8212; it does seem to be pretty evenly divided between the two camps.  I happen to have fallen in the camp that likes full posts.  I&#8217;ll look forward to seeing the modified posts in my reader, though.</p>
<p>And the truth is, I love the ground rules for commenting that you&#8217;ve laid out, especially in their new revised form.  They&#8217;re easy to read and make a lot of sense.</p>
<p>Really looking forward to tracking with you on your blogging journey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compassion takes a blogging risk by Chris Giovagnoni</title>
		<link>http://twogoats.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/compassion-takes-a-blogging-risk/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Giovagnoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twogoats.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the hints. 

Just last night I modified the amount of each post that shows up in the feed. And we aren&#039;t necessarily married to a summary feed. We&#039;ve adopted it, not because of ad revenue (We don&#039;t have ads on the site), but because of individual preferences. 

For every person that prefers the full feed, there&#039;s someone that prefers the summary. However, we&#039;re still going back and forth over this.

Even though the ground rules said a commenter should use first and last name, it also said comments &quot;may&quot; be deleted if the rules weren&#039;t followed. 

The truth is that we weren&#039;t &quot;enforcing&quot; that rule. It was a remnant of an early draft of the text. I have updated the page. 

http://blog.compassion.com/ground-rules-for-leaving-comments-on-the-compassion-blog/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the hints. </p>
<p>Just last night I modified the amount of each post that shows up in the feed. And we aren&#8217;t necessarily married to a summary feed. We&#8217;ve adopted it, not because of ad revenue (We don&#8217;t have ads on the site), but because of individual preferences. </p>
<p>For every person that prefers the full feed, there&#8217;s someone that prefers the summary. However, we&#8217;re still going back and forth over this.</p>
<p>Even though the ground rules said a commenter should use first and last name, it also said comments &#8220;may&#8221; be deleted if the rules weren&#8217;t followed. </p>
<p>The truth is that we weren&#8217;t &#8220;enforcing&#8221; that rule. It was a remnant of an early draft of the text. I have updated the page. </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.compassion.com/ground-rules-for-leaving-comments-on-the-compassion-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.compassion.com/ground-rules-for-leaving-comments-on-the-compassion-blog/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
